Skip to main content

Coopers Plains vs Labrador

Property investment comparison - Coopers Plains, QLD 4108 vs Labrador, QLD 4215

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coopers Plains wins 2, Labrador wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoopers PlainsLabrador
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$840K$830K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.79%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%4.65%
1-year house growth+5.8%estimate+11.7%
3-year house growth-+46.8%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.1%
Population5,67518,643

Coopers Plains vs Labrador: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Coopers Plains and $1.3M in Labrador, so Coopers Plains is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Coopers Plains sits at a median of $840K against $830K in Labrador, which makes Labrador the more affordable unit market and Coopers Plains the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.8% in Coopers Plains (an estimate) and +11.7% in Labrador, so recent momentum favours Labrador, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Coopers Plains and 1.1% in Labrador, so landlords in Coopers Plains face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Labrador is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,643 against 5,675, roughly 3.3 times the size of Coopers Plains; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coopers Plains for a lower purchase price, Labrador for recent price momentum, Coopers Plains for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison