Skip to main content

Cooran vs Port Douglas

Property investment comparison - Cooran, QLD 4569 vs Port Douglas, QLD 4877

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooran wins 1, Port Douglas wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooranPort Douglas
Median house price$960K$960K
Median unit price$750K$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.51%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)2.41%7.80%
1-year house growth+8.9%estimate+4.4%
3-year house growth-+6.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.7%
Population1,7563,650

Cooran vs Port Douglas: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $960K in Cooran and $960K in Port Douglas.

For units, Cooran sits at a median of $750K against $385K in Port Douglas, which makes Port Douglas the more affordable unit market and Cooran the pricier one.

On cash flow, Port Douglas leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.51% in Cooran, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Cooran (an estimate) and +4.4% in Port Douglas, so recent momentum favours Cooran, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Port Douglas and 1.1% in Cooran, so landlords in Port Douglas face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Port Douglas is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,650 against 1,756, roughly 2.1 times the size of Cooran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Port Douglas for rental income, Cooran for recent price momentum, Port Douglas for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison