Skip to main content

Coramba vs Raymond Terrace

Property investment comparison - Coramba, NSW 2450 vs Raymond Terrace, NSW 2324

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coramba wins 0, Raymond Terrace wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCorambaRaymond Terrace
Median house price$770K$765K
Median unit price$570K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.68%5.05%
1-year house growth+12.0%+12.0%
3-year house growth+17.0%+20.6%
Vacancy rate3.7%1.4%
Population81713,453

Coramba vs Raymond Terrace: what the numbers say

The median house price is $770K in Coramba and $765K in Raymond Terrace, so Raymond Terrace is the cheaper entry point, with Coramba houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coramba sits at a median of $570K against $540K in Raymond Terrace, which makes Raymond Terrace the more affordable unit market and Coramba the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Coramba houses are +17.0% and Raymond Terrace houses +20.6%, so Raymond Terrace has compounded faster than Coramba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Raymond Terrace and 3.7% in Coramba, so landlords in Raymond Terrace face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Raymond Terrace is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,453 against 817, roughly 16 times the size of Coramba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Raymond Terrace for a lower purchase price, Raymond Terrace for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison