Skip to main content

Coramba vs Windellama

Property investment comparison - Coramba, NSW 2450 vs Windellama, NSW 2580

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coramba wins 2, Windellama wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCorambaWindellama
Median house price$770K$765K
Median unit price$570K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.84%
Gross rental yield (units)4.68%4.28%
1-year house growth+12.0%+20.6%estimate
3-year house growth+17.0%-
Vacancy rate3.7%6.1%
Population817417

Coramba vs Windellama: what the numbers say

The median house price is $770K in Coramba and $765K in Windellama, so Windellama is the cheaper entry point, with Coramba houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coramba sits at a median of $570K against $560K in Windellama, which makes Windellama the more affordable unit market and Coramba the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Coramba and +20.6% in Windellama (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Windellama, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.7% in Coramba and 6.1% in Windellama, so landlords in Coramba face less competition for tenants.

Coramba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 817 against 417, larger than Windellama; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windellama for a lower purchase price, Windellama for recent price momentum, Coramba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison