Skip to main content

Corowa vs Manildra

Property investment comparison - Corowa, NSW 2646 vs Manildra, NSW 2865

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Corowa wins 2, Manildra wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCorowaManildra
Median house price$490K$490K
Median unit price$375K$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.56%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.53%
1-year house growth+5.6%+11.3%estimate
3-year house growth+16.7%-
Vacancy rate0.9%1.9%
Population5,595822

Corowa vs Manildra: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $490K in Corowa and $490K in Manildra.

For units, Corowa sits at a median of $375K against $525K in Manildra, which makes Corowa the more affordable unit market and Manildra the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.6% in Corowa and +11.3% in Manildra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Manildra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Corowa and 1.9% in Manildra, so landlords in Corowa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Corowa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,595 against 822, roughly 7 times the size of Manildra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Manildra for recent price momentum, Corowa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison