Skip to main content

Corrimal vs Umina

Property investment comparison - Corrimal, NSW 2518 vs Umina, NSW 2257

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Corrimal wins 4, Umina wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCorrimalUmina
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$735K$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%2.65%
Gross rental yield (units)4.22%3.23%
1-year house growth+7.6%+10.7%
3-year house growth+19.2%-
Vacancy rate0.7%1.5%
Population6,97222,140

Corrimal vs Umina: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Corrimal and $1.3M in Umina.

For units, Corrimal sits at a median of $735K against $880K in Umina, which makes Corrimal the more affordable unit market and Umina the pricier one.

On cash flow, Corrimal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.65% in Umina, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Corrimal and +10.7% in Umina, so recent momentum favours Umina, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Corrimal and 1.5% in Umina, so landlords in Corrimal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Umina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,140 against 6,972, roughly 3.2 times the size of Corrimal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Corrimal for rental income, Umina for recent price momentum, Corrimal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison