Cowangie vs Dartmoor
Property investment comparison - Cowangie, VIC 3506 vs Dartmoor, VIC 3304
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cowangie wins 0, Dartmoor wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cowangie | Dartmoor |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $235K | $235K |
| Median unit price | - | $415K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.95% | 9.96% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.38% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.8% |
| Population | 33 | 299 |
Cowangie vs Dartmoor: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $235K in Cowangie and $235K in Dartmoor.
On cash flow, Dartmoor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 9.96%, compared with 6.95% in Cowangie, a gap of 3.01 percentage points.
Dartmoor is the bigger suburb, with a population of 299 against 33, roughly 9 times the size of Cowangie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dartmoor for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison