Skip to main content

Crace vs Gungahlin

Property investment comparison - Crace, ACT 2911 vs Gungahlin, ACT 2912

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Crace wins 3, Gungahlin wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCraceGungahlin
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$435K$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)6.62%6.50%
1-year house growth-2.3%+6.5%
3-year house growth+29.2%+15.6%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.4%
Population4,8008,586

Crace vs Gungahlin: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Crace and $1.1M in Gungahlin, so Gungahlin is the cheaper entry point, with Crace houses about 3% dearer.

For units, Crace sits at a median of $435K against $430K in Gungahlin, which makes Gungahlin the more affordable unit market and Crace the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.3% in Crace and +6.5% in Gungahlin, so recent momentum favours Gungahlin, while Crace went backwards.

Looking back three years, Crace houses are +29.2% and Gungahlin houses +15.6%, so Crace has compounded faster than Gungahlin over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Crace and 1.4% in Gungahlin, so landlords in Crace face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gungahlin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,586 against 4,800, larger than Crace; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gungahlin for a lower purchase price, Gungahlin for recent price momentum, Crace for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison