Skip to main content

Cranebrook vs Narellan

Property investment comparison - Cranebrook, NSW 2749 vs Narellan, NSW 2567

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cranebrook wins 3, Narellan wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCranebrookNarellan
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$880K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.21%
Gross rental yield (units)3.43%4.14%
1-year house growth+8.9%estimate+6.9%
3-year house growth-+12.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.4%
Population15,7793,358

Cranebrook vs Narellan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Cranebrook and $1.1M in Narellan, so Cranebrook is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cranebrook sits at a median of $880K against $770K in Narellan, which makes Narellan the more affordable unit market and Cranebrook the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Cranebrook (an estimate) and +6.9% in Narellan, so recent momentum favours Cranebrook, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Cranebrook and 2.4% in Narellan, so landlords in Cranebrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cranebrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,779 against 3,358, roughly 4.7 times the size of Narellan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cranebrook for a lower purchase price, Cranebrook for recent price momentum, Cranebrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Cranebrook vs Narellan: Suburb Comparison 2026