Skip to main content

Cranley vs Eagleby

Property investment comparison - Cranley, QLD 4350 vs Eagleby, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cranley wins 3, Eagleby wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCranleyEagleby
Median house price$845K$845K
Median unit price-$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%3.77%
Gross rental yield (units)3.70%4.30%
1-year house growth+20.3%estimate+20.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.1%
Population2,28113,594

Cranley vs Eagleby: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $845K in Cranley and $845K in Eagleby.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.80% in Cranley and 3.77% in Eagleby, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.3% in Cranley (an estimate) and +20.1% in Eagleby (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cranley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cranley and 1.1% in Eagleby, so landlords in Cranley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Eagleby is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,594 against 2,281, roughly 6 times the size of Cranley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cranley for recent price momentum, Cranley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison