Crib Point vs Hansonville
Property investment comparison - Crib Point, VIC 3919 vs Hansonville, VIC 3675
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Crib Point wins 2, Hansonville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Crib Point | Hansonville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $785K | $785K |
| Median unit price | $620K | $500K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.16% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.70% | 3.60% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | - |
| Population | 3,343 | 155 |
Crib Point vs Hansonville: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $785K in Crib Point and $785K in Hansonville.
For units, Crib Point sits at a median of $620K against $500K in Hansonville, which makes Hansonville the more affordable unit market and Crib Point the pricier one.
On cash flow, Crib Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.16% in Hansonville, a gap of 0.82 percentage points.
Crib Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,343 against 155, roughly 22 times the size of Hansonville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Crib Point for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison