Skip to main content

Cromer vs Warriewood

Property investment comparison - Cromer, NSW 2099 vs Warriewood, NSW 2102

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cromer wins 4, Warriewood wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCromerWarriewood
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$985K$1.5M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.32%
Gross rental yield (units)3.93%3.44%
1-year house growth+4.9%+3.5%estimate
3-year house growth+6.8%-
Vacancy rate0.3%1.6%
Population8,0308,379

Cromer vs Warriewood: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Cromer and $2.5M in Warriewood.

For units, Cromer sits at a median of $985K against $1.5M in Warriewood, which makes Cromer the more affordable unit market and Warriewood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Cromer and +3.5% in Warriewood (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cromer, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Cromer and 1.6% in Warriewood, so landlords in Cromer face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warriewood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,379 against 8,030, larger than Cromer; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cromer for recent price momentum, Cromer for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison