Skip to main content

Cudgen vs Maddens Plains

Property investment comparison - Cudgen, NSW 2487 vs Maddens Plains, NSW 2508

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cudgen wins 1, Maddens Plains wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCudgenMaddens Plains
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.92%3.43%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.11%
1-year house growth+7.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.4%1.0%
Population9528

Cudgen vs Maddens Plains: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Cudgen and $1.3M in Maddens Plains, so Maddens Plains is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Cudgen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.92%, compared with 3.43% in Maddens Plains, a gap of 1.49 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Maddens Plains and 3.4% in Cudgen, so landlords in Maddens Plains face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cudgen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 952 against 8, roughly 119 times the size of Maddens Plains; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cudgen for rental income, Maddens Plains for a lower purchase price, Maddens Plains for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison