Skip to main content

Cumbalum vs Granville

Property investment comparison - Cumbalum, NSW 2478 vs Granville, NSW 2142

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cumbalum wins 0, Granville wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCumbalumGranville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$920K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.12%
Gross rental yield (units)4.02%6.25%
1-year house growth+1.4%+6.4%estimate
3-year house growth+17.1%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.5%
Population2,21116,716

Cumbalum vs Granville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Cumbalum and $1.3M in Granville.

For units, Cumbalum sits at a median of $920K against $530K in Granville, which makes Granville the more affordable unit market and Cumbalum the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.4% in Cumbalum and +6.4% in Granville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Granville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Granville and 1.6% in Cumbalum, so landlords in Granville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Granville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,716 against 2,211, roughly 8 times the size of Cumbalum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Granville for recent price momentum, Granville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison