Curdies River vs Leneva
Property investment comparison - Curdies River, VIC 3268 vs Leneva, VIC 3691
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curdies River wins 1, Leneva wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Curdies River | Leneva |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | - | $555K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.20% | 4.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.96% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 4.6% |
| Population | 25 | 1,317 |
Curdies River vs Leneva: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Curdies River and $740K in Leneva.
On cash flow, Leneva leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 3.20% in Curdies River, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.8% in Curdies River and 4.6% in Leneva, so landlords in Curdies River face less competition for tenants.
Leneva is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,317 against 25, roughly 53 times the size of Curdies River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Leneva for rental income, Curdies River for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison