Curdies River vs McKenzie Hill
Property investment comparison - Curdies River, VIC 3268 vs McKenzie Hill, VIC 3451
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curdies River wins 2, McKenzie Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Curdies River | McKenzie Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $745K |
| Median unit price | - | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.20% | 3.58% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.63% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 3.5% |
| Population | 25 | 775 |
Curdies River vs McKenzie Hill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $740K in Curdies River and $745K in McKenzie Hill, so Curdies River is the cheaper entry point, with McKenzie Hill houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, McKenzie Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.58%, compared with 3.20% in Curdies River, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.8% in Curdies River and 3.5% in McKenzie Hill, so landlords in Curdies River face less competition for tenants.
McKenzie Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 775 against 25, roughly 31 times the size of Curdies River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: McKenzie Hill for rental income, Curdies River for a lower purchase price, Curdies River for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison