Skip to main content

Cygnet vs Franklin

Property investment comparison - Cygnet, TAS 7112 vs Franklin, TAS 7113

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cygnet wins 3, Franklin wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCygnetFranklin
Median house price$760K$775K
Median unit price-$380K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.72%
Gross rental yield (units)3.87%3.44%
1-year house growth+7.9%+8.5%estimate
3-year house growth-5.0%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.1%
Population1,7421,301

Cygnet vs Franklin: what the numbers say

The median house price is $760K in Cygnet and $775K in Franklin, so Cygnet is the cheaper entry point, with Franklin houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Franklin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.72%, compared with 3.39% in Cygnet, a gap of 0.33 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Cygnet and +8.5% in Franklin (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Franklin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cygnet and 1.1% in Franklin, so landlords in Cygnet face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cygnet is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,742 against 1,301, larger than Franklin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Franklin for rental income, Cygnet for a lower purchase price, Franklin for recent price momentum, Cygnet for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison