Cygnet vs Kayena
Property investment comparison - Cygnet, TAS 7112 vs Kayena, TAS 7270
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cygnet wins 2, Kayena wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cygnet | Kayena |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $760K | $750K |
| Median unit price | - | $660K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.39% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.87% | 3.00% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -5.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 2.0% |
| Population | 1,742 | 221 |
Cygnet vs Kayena: what the numbers say
The median house price is $760K in Cygnet and $750K in Kayena, so Kayena is the cheaper entry point, with Cygnet houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cygnet and 2.0% in Kayena, so landlords in Cygnet face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Cygnet is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,742 against 221, roughly 8 times the size of Kayena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kayena for a lower purchase price, Cygnet for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison