Skip to main content

Dalwood vs Hurstville

Property investment comparison - Dalwood, NSW 2335 vs Hurstville, NSW 2220

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalwood wins 3, Hurstville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalwoodHurstville
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price$555K$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.88%2.00%
Gross rental yield (units)5.70%4.98%
1-year house growth-+4.2%
3-year house growth-+23.8%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.3%
Population11131,162

Dalwood vs Hurstville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Dalwood and $2.2M in Hurstville, so Dalwood is the cheaper entry point, with Hurstville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Dalwood sits at a median of $555K against $780K in Hurstville, which makes Dalwood the more affordable unit market and Hurstville the pricier one.

On cash flow, Hurstville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.00%, compared with 1.88% in Dalwood, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Hurstville and 1.5% in Dalwood, so landlords in Hurstville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hurstville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,162 against 111, roughly 281 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hurstville for rental income, Dalwood for a lower purchase price, Hurstville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison