Skip to main content

Dalwood vs Sylvania

Property investment comparison - Dalwood, NSW 2477 vs Sylvania, NSW 2224

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalwood wins 3, Sylvania wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalwoodSylvania
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$640K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.18%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)5.85%3.18%
1-year house growth-+5.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%1.7%
Population21810,749

Dalwood vs Sylvania: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Dalwood and $2.1M in Sylvania, so Sylvania is the cheaper entry point, with Dalwood houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Dalwood sits at a median of $640K against $1.3M in Sylvania, which makes Dalwood the more affordable unit market and Sylvania the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sylvania leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.89%, compared with 2.18% in Dalwood, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Dalwood and 1.7% in Sylvania, so landlords in Dalwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sylvania is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,749 against 218, roughly 49 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sylvania for rental income, Sylvania for a lower purchase price, Dalwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison