Darlington vs Riverton
Property investment comparison - Darlington, WA 6070 vs Riverton, WA 6148
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darlington wins 0, Riverton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Darlington | Riverton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $675K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.54% | 4.10% |
| 1-year house growth | +13.9%estimate | +18.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +78.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 5.3% | 1.0% |
| Population | 3,725 | 6,078 |
Darlington vs Riverton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Darlington and $1.3M in Riverton.
Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Darlington (an estimate) and +18.8% in Riverton, so recent momentum favours Riverton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Riverton and 5.3% in Darlington, so landlords in Riverton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Riverton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,078 against 3,725, larger than Darlington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Riverton for recent price momentum, Riverton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison