Skip to main content

Daruka vs Narara

Property investment comparison - Daruka, NSW 2340 vs Narara, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Daruka wins 4, Narara wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDarukaNarara
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$360K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)6.66%4.31%
1-year house growth+6.7%+7.6%
3-year house growth+26.1%+0.0%
Vacancy rate8.2%0.9%
Population7708,471

Daruka vs Narara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Daruka and $1.0M in Narara, so Daruka is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Daruka sits at a median of $360K against $730K in Narara, which makes Daruka the more affordable unit market and Narara the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.7% in Daruka and +7.6% in Narara, so recent momentum favours Narara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Daruka houses are +26.1% and Narara houses +0.0%, so Daruka has compounded faster than Narara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Narara and 8.2% in Daruka, so landlords in Narara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Narara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,471 against 770, roughly 11 times the size of Daruka; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Daruka for a lower purchase price, Narara for recent price momentum, Narara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Daruka vs Narara: Property Investment Comparison (2026)