Skip to main content

Davistown vs Haywards Bay

Property investment comparison - Davistown, NSW 2251 vs Haywards Bay, NSW 2530

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Davistown wins 3, Haywards Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDavistownHaywards Bay
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$680K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%2.87%
Gross rental yield (units)3.84%4.84%
1-year house growth+5.3%+21.8%
3-year house growth+29.7%+22.9%
Vacancy rate0.4%4.9%
Population2,6021,280

Davistown vs Haywards Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Davistown and $1.3M in Haywards Bay.

On cash flow, Davistown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.87% in Haywards Bay, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Davistown and +21.8% in Haywards Bay, so recent momentum favours Haywards Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Davistown houses are +29.7% and Haywards Bay houses +22.9%, so Davistown has compounded faster than Haywards Bay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Davistown and 4.9% in Haywards Bay, so landlords in Davistown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Davistown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,602 against 1,280, roughly 2.0 times the size of Haywards Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Davistown for rental income, Haywards Bay for recent price momentum, Davistown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison