Skip to main content

Davistown vs Umina

Property investment comparison - Davistown, NSW 2251 vs Umina, NSW 2257

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Davistown wins 3, Umina wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDavistownUmina
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%2.65%
Gross rental yield (units)3.84%3.23%
1-year house growth+5.3%+10.7%
3-year house growth+29.7%-
Vacancy rate0.4%1.5%
Population2,60222,140

Davistown vs Umina: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Davistown and $1.3M in Umina, so Umina is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Davistown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.65% in Umina, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Davistown and +10.7% in Umina, so recent momentum favours Umina, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Davistown and 1.5% in Umina, so landlords in Davistown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Umina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,140 against 2,602, roughly 9 times the size of Davistown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Davistown for rental income, Umina for a lower purchase price, Umina for recent price momentum, Davistown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison