Skip to main content

Dawesville vs Lynwood

Property investment comparison - Dawesville, WA 6211 vs Lynwood, WA 6147

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dawesville wins 0, Lynwood wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDawesvilleLynwood
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.75%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.07%5.20%
1-year house growth+14.9%+19.6%
3-year house growth+58.9%+76.2%
Vacancy rate6.1%1.2%
Population7,1433,541

Dawesville vs Lynwood: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Dawesville and $880K in Lynwood.

On cash flow, Lynwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.75% in Dawesville, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Dawesville and +19.6% in Lynwood, so recent momentum favours Lynwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Dawesville houses are +58.9% and Lynwood houses +76.2%, so Lynwood has compounded faster than Dawesville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Lynwood and 6.1% in Dawesville, so landlords in Lynwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dawesville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,143 against 3,541, roughly 2.0 times the size of Lynwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lynwood for rental income, Lynwood for recent price momentum, Lynwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison