Daylesford vs Tarago
Property investment comparison - Daylesford, VIC 3460 vs Tarago, VIC 3818
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Daylesford wins 2, Tarago wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Daylesford | Tarago |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | $800K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.57% | 3.26% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.05% | 5.21% |
| 1-year house growth | -2.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -11.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.6% |
| Population | 2,781 | 21,626 |
Daylesford vs Tarago: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Daylesford and $800K in Tarago.
On cash flow, Daylesford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 3.26% in Tarago, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Daylesford and 1.6% in Tarago, so landlords in Daylesford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tarago is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,626 against 2,781, roughly 8 times the size of Daylesford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Daylesford for rental income, Daylesford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison