Daylesford vs Warrong
Property investment comparison - Daylesford, VIC 3460 vs Warrong, VIC 3283
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Daylesford wins 2, Warrong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Daylesford | Warrong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | $800K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.57% | 2.43% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.05% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -2.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -11.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 6.0% |
| Population | 2,781 | 77 |
Daylesford vs Warrong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Daylesford and $800K in Warrong.
On cash flow, Daylesford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 2.43% in Warrong, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Daylesford and 6.0% in Warrong, so landlords in Daylesford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Daylesford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,781 against 77, roughly 36 times the size of Warrong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Daylesford for rental income, Daylesford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison