Deagon vs Joyner
Property investment comparison - Deagon, QLD 4017 vs Joyner, QLD 4500
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deagon wins 2, Joyner wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Deagon | Joyner |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $340K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.24% | 3.40% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.04% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.0% |
| 3-year house growth | +45.7% | +19.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 3.6% |
| Population | 3,773 | 3,600 |
Deagon vs Joyner: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Deagon and $1.1M in Joyner, so Joyner is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Joyner leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.40%, compared with 3.24% in Deagon, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.
Looking back three years, Deagon houses are +45.7% and Joyner houses +19.6%, so Deagon has compounded faster than Joyner over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Deagon and 3.6% in Joyner, so landlords in Deagon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Deagon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,773 against 3,600, larger than Joyner; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Joyner for rental income, Joyner for a lower purchase price, Deagon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison