Skip to main content

Deagon vs Karrabin

Property investment comparison - Deagon, QLD 4017 vs Karrabin, QLD 4306

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deagon wins 2, Karrabin wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDeagonKarrabin
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$340K$335K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%2.87%
Gross rental yield (units)6.04%7.93%
1-year house growth-+8.6%
3-year house growth+45.7%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.1%
Population3,773416

Deagon vs Karrabin: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Deagon and $1.1M in Karrabin, so Karrabin is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Deagon sits at a median of $340K against $335K in Karrabin, which makes Karrabin the more affordable unit market and Deagon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Deagon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 2.87% in Karrabin, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Deagon and 1.1% in Karrabin, so landlords in Deagon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Deagon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,773 against 416, roughly 9 times the size of Karrabin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Deagon for rental income, Karrabin for a lower purchase price, Deagon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison