Dean Park vs Minto
Property investment comparison - Dean Park, NSW 2761 vs Minto, NSW 2566
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dean Park wins 1, Minto wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dean Park | Minto |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $735K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.46% | 3.54% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.8% | +8.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +24.6% | +19.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,180 | 13,940 |
Dean Park vs Minto: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Dean Park and $1.1M in Minto.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.8% in both suburbs.
Looking back three years, Dean Park houses are +24.6% and Minto houses +19.0%, so Dean Park has compounded faster than Minto over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Minto and 1.9% in Dean Park, so landlords in Minto face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Minto is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,940 against 3,180, roughly 4.4 times the size of Dean Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Minto for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison