Delahey vs Meadow Creek
Property investment comparison - Delahey, VIC 3037 vs Meadow Creek, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Delahey wins 1, Meadow Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Delahey | Meadow Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $745K | $745K |
| Median unit price | $610K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.51% | 5.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.97% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +15.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Population | 8,077 | 112 |
Delahey vs Meadow Creek: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Delahey and $745K in Meadow Creek.
On cash flow, Meadow Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.23%, compared with 3.51% in Delahey, a gap of 1.72 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Delahey and 2.9% in Meadow Creek, so landlords in Delahey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Delahey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,077 against 112, roughly 72 times the size of Meadow Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Meadow Creek for rental income, Delahey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison