Deniliquin vs Urbenville
Property investment comparison - Deniliquin, NSW 2710 vs Urbenville, NSW 2475
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deniliquin wins 3, Urbenville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Deniliquin | Urbenville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $415K | $410K |
| Median unit price | - | $255K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.58% | 3.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.62% | 3.38% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| Population | 7,432 | 331 |
Deniliquin vs Urbenville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $415K in Deniliquin and $410K in Urbenville, so Urbenville is the cheaper entry point, with Deniliquin houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Deniliquin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.58%, compared with 3.35% in Urbenville, a gap of 2.23 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Deniliquin and 1.9% in Urbenville, so landlords in Deniliquin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Deniliquin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,432 against 331, roughly 22 times the size of Urbenville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Deniliquin for rental income, Urbenville for a lower purchase price, Deniliquin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison