Deniliquin vs Woodenbong
Property investment comparison - Deniliquin, NSW 2710 vs Woodenbong, NSW 2476
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deniliquin wins 2, Woodenbong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Deniliquin | Woodenbong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $415K | $415K |
| Median unit price | - | $155K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.58% | 4.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.62% | 6.71% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 1.8% |
| Population | 7,432 | 390 |
Deniliquin vs Woodenbong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $415K in Deniliquin and $415K in Woodenbong.
On cash flow, Deniliquin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.58%, compared with 4.66% in Woodenbong, a gap of 0.92 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Deniliquin and 1.8% in Woodenbong, so landlords in Deniliquin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Deniliquin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,432 against 390, roughly 19 times the size of Woodenbong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Deniliquin for rental income, Deniliquin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison