Dimboola vs Tutye
Property investment comparison - Dimboola, VIC 3414 vs Tutye, VIC 3490
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dimboola wins 1, Tutye wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dimboola | Tutye |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320K | $315K |
| Median unit price | $375K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.98% | 5.02% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.31% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +19.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 0.4% |
| Population | 1,635 | 21 |
Dimboola vs Tutye: what the numbers say
The median house price is $320K in Dimboola and $315K in Tutye, so Tutye is the cheaper entry point, with Dimboola houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Dimboola leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.98%, compared with 5.02% in Tutye, a gap of 0.96 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Tutye and 1.0% in Dimboola, so landlords in Tutye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Dimboola is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,635 against 21, roughly 78 times the size of Tutye; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dimboola for rental income, Tutye for a lower purchase price, Tutye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison