Skip to main content

Dinmore vs Shaw

Property investment comparison - Dinmore, QLD 4303 vs Shaw, QLD 4818

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dinmore wins 2, Shaw wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDinmoreShaw
Median house price$745K$745K
Median unit price$560K$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%5.00%
1-year house growth-+15.8%
3-year house growth+77.8%+70.3%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.7%
Population1,109760

Dinmore vs Shaw: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Dinmore and $745K in Shaw.

For units, Dinmore sits at a median of $560K against $525K in Shaw, which makes Shaw the more affordable unit market and Dinmore the pricier one.

On cash flow, Shaw leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 4.00% in Dinmore, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Dinmore houses are +77.8% and Shaw houses +70.3%, so Dinmore has compounded faster than Shaw over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Dinmore and 0.7% in Shaw, so landlords in Dinmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dinmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,109 against 760, larger than Shaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Shaw for rental income, Dinmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison