Skip to main content

Djugun vs Lynwood

Property investment comparison - Djugun, WA 6725 vs Lynwood, WA 6147

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Djugun wins 3, Lynwood wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDjugunLynwood
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)7.50%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)8.76%5.20%
1-year house growth+9.6%+19.6%
3-year house growth+29.3%+76.2%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.2%
Population3,2913,541

Djugun vs Lynwood: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Djugun and $880K in Lynwood.

On cash flow, Djugun leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.50%, compared with 4.40% in Lynwood, a gap of 3.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.6% in Djugun and +19.6% in Lynwood, so recent momentum favours Lynwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Djugun houses are +29.3% and Lynwood houses +76.2%, so Lynwood has compounded faster than Djugun over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Djugun and 1.2% in Lynwood, so landlords in Djugun face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lynwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,541 against 3,291, larger than Djugun; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Djugun for rental income, Lynwood for recent price momentum, Djugun for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison