Skip to main content

Dog Rocks vs Hamilton Valley

Property investment comparison - Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 vs Hamilton Valley, NSW 2641

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dog Rocks wins 3, Hamilton Valley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDog RocksHamilton Valley
Median house price$670K$665K
Median unit price$445K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.36%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)5.41%4.49%
1-year house growth-+9.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.7%3.1%
Population7834

Dog Rocks vs Hamilton Valley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $670K in Dog Rocks and $665K in Hamilton Valley, so Hamilton Valley is the cheaper entry point, with Dog Rocks houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Dog Rocks leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.36%, compared with 4.20% in Hamilton Valley, a gap of 1.16 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Dog Rocks and 3.1% in Hamilton Valley, so landlords in Dog Rocks face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 834 against 7, roughly 119 times the size of Dog Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dog Rocks for rental income, Hamilton Valley for a lower purchase price, Dog Rocks for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison