Douglas vs Edenhope
Property investment comparison - Douglas, VIC 3409 vs Edenhope, VIC 3318
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Douglas wins 2, Edenhope wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Douglas | Edenhope |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $260K | $320K |
| Median unit price | - | $340K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.61% | 6.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.57% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 0.8% |
| Population | 74 | 937 |
Douglas vs Edenhope: what the numbers say
The median house price is $260K in Douglas and $320K in Edenhope, so Douglas is the cheaper entry point, with Edenhope houses about 23% dearer.
On cash flow, Douglas leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.61%, compared with 6.30% in Edenhope, a gap of 1.31 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Edenhope and 1.7% in Douglas, so landlords in Edenhope face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Edenhope is the bigger suburb, with a population of 937 against 74, roughly 13 times the size of Douglas; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Douglas for rental income, Douglas for a lower purchase price, Edenhope for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison