Skip to main content

Dulwich Hill vs Narraweena

Property investment comparison - Dulwich Hill, NSW 2203 vs Narraweena, NSW 2099

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dulwich Hill wins 3, Narraweena wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDulwich HillNarraweena
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$970K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.23%2.54%
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%3.86%
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate+3.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%0.8%
Population14,0466,971

Dulwich Hill vs Narraweena: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Dulwich Hill and $2.5M in Narraweena, so Dulwich Hill is the cheaper entry point, with Narraweena houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Narraweena leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.54%, compared with 2.23% in Dulwich Hill, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.2% in Dulwich Hill (an estimate) and +3.2% in Narraweena (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Dulwich Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Narraweena and 1.1% in Dulwich Hill, so landlords in Narraweena face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dulwich Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,046 against 6,971, roughly 2.0 times the size of Narraweena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Narraweena for rental income, Dulwich Hill for a lower purchase price, Dulwich Hill for recent price momentum, Narraweena for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison