Skip to main content

Dulwich Hill vs Wedderburn

Property investment comparison - Dulwich Hill, NSW 2203 vs Wedderburn, NSW 2560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dulwich Hill wins 3, Wedderburn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDulwich HillWedderburn
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$970K$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.23%1.56%
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%4.91%
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%7.7%
Population14,046665

Dulwich Hill vs Wedderburn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Dulwich Hill and $2.5M in Wedderburn, so Dulwich Hill is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Dulwich Hill sits at a median of $970K against $525K in Wedderburn, which makes Wedderburn the more affordable unit market and Dulwich Hill the pricier one.

On cash flow, Dulwich Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.23%, compared with 1.56% in Wedderburn, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Dulwich Hill and 7.7% in Wedderburn, so landlords in Dulwich Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dulwich Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,046 against 665, roughly 21 times the size of Wedderburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dulwich Hill for rental income, Dulwich Hill for a lower purchase price, Dulwich Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison