Skip to main content

Duncraig vs Parkerville

Property investment comparison - Duncraig, WA 6023 vs Parkerville, WA 6081

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Duncraig wins 3, Parkerville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDuncraigParkerville
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$860K$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)4.33%1.95%
1-year house growth+15.4%-
3-year house growth+56.8%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.4%
Population15,9822,432

Duncraig vs Parkerville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Duncraig and $1.5M in Parkerville.

For units, Duncraig sits at a median of $860K against $695K in Parkerville, which makes Parkerville the more affordable unit market and Duncraig the pricier one.

On cash flow, Duncraig leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.84% in Parkerville, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Duncraig and 1.4% in Parkerville, so landlords in Duncraig face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Duncraig is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,982 against 2,432, roughly 7 times the size of Parkerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Duncraig for rental income, Duncraig for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison