Skip to main content

Ebbw Vale vs Greenmount

Property investment comparison - Ebbw Vale, QLD 4304 vs Greenmount, QLD 4751

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ebbw Vale wins 2, Greenmount wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEbbw ValeGreenmount
Median house price$810K$810K
Median unit price$725K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.65%2.71%
Gross rental yield (units)4.12%5.17%
1-year house growth+22.2%estimate+8.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate5.6%2.8%
Population540488

Ebbw Vale vs Greenmount: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $810K in Ebbw Vale and $810K in Greenmount.

For units, Ebbw Vale sits at a median of $725K against $670K in Greenmount, which makes Greenmount the more affordable unit market and Ebbw Vale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ebbw Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 2.71% in Greenmount, a gap of 0.94 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.2% in Ebbw Vale (an estimate) and +8.6% in Greenmount (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ebbw Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.8% in Greenmount and 5.6% in Ebbw Vale, so landlords in Greenmount face less competition for tenants.

Ebbw Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 540 against 488, larger than Greenmount; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ebbw Vale for rental income, Ebbw Vale for recent price momentum, Greenmount for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison