Skip to main content

Edenhope vs Kewell

Property investment comparison - Edenhope, VIC 3318 vs Kewell, VIC 3390

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edenhope wins 2, Kewell wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEdenhopeKewell
Median house price$320K$275K
Median unit price$340K$290K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.30%5.07%
Gross rental yield (units)3.57%-
1-year house growth+3.4%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%0.9%
Population93757

Edenhope vs Kewell: what the numbers say

The median house price is $320K in Edenhope and $275K in Kewell, so Kewell is the cheaper entry point, with Edenhope houses about 16% dearer.

For units, Edenhope sits at a median of $340K against $290K in Kewell, which makes Kewell the more affordable unit market and Edenhope the pricier one.

On cash flow, Edenhope leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.30%, compared with 5.07% in Kewell, a gap of 1.23 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Edenhope and 0.9% in Kewell, so landlords in Edenhope face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edenhope is the bigger suburb, with a population of 937 against 57, roughly 16 times the size of Kewell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edenhope for rental income, Kewell for a lower purchase price, Edenhope for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison