Edensor Park vs Mount Wilson
Property investment comparison - Edensor Park, NSW 2176 vs Mount Wilson, NSW 2786
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edensor Park wins 1, Mount Wilson wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Edensor Park | Mount Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.5M | $1.5M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.52% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.93% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 8.4% |
| Population | 10,279 | 81 |
Edensor Park vs Mount Wilson: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.5M in Edensor Park and $1.5M in Mount Wilson, so Mount Wilson is the cheaper entry point, with Edensor Park houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Edensor Park and 8.4% in Mount Wilson, so landlords in Edensor Park face less competition for tenants.
Edensor Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,279 against 81, roughly 127 times the size of Mount Wilson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Wilson for a lower purchase price, Edensor Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison