Skip to main content

Edithvale vs Kooroocheang

Property investment comparison - Edithvale, VIC 3196 vs Kooroocheang, VIC 3364

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edithvale wins 1, Kooroocheang wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEdithvaleKooroocheang
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$860K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.02%2.01%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%-
1-year house growth+4.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%1.4%
Population6,27641

Edithvale vs Kooroocheang: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Edithvale and $1.3M in Kooroocheang, so Kooroocheang is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Edithvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.02%, compared with 2.01% in Kooroocheang, a gap of 1.01 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kooroocheang and 1.8% in Edithvale, so landlords in Kooroocheang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edithvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,276 against 41, roughly 153 times the size of Kooroocheang; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edithvale for rental income, Kooroocheang for a lower purchase price, Kooroocheang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison