Skip to main content

Edmondson Park vs Keiraville

Property investment comparison - Edmondson Park, NSW 2174 vs Keiraville, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edmondson Park wins 3, Keiraville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEdmondson ParkKeiraville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$750K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.04%3.31%
1-year house growth+6.5%+3.9%estimate
3-year house growth+7.1%-
Vacancy rate3.1%1.6%
Population12,0804,001

Edmondson Park vs Keiraville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Edmondson Park and $1.3M in Keiraville.

For units, Edmondson Park sits at a median of $750K against $910K in Keiraville, which makes Edmondson Park the more affordable unit market and Keiraville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Edmondson Park and +3.9% in Keiraville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Edmondson Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Keiraville and 3.1% in Edmondson Park, so landlords in Keiraville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edmondson Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,080 against 4,001, roughly 3.0 times the size of Keiraville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edmondson Park for recent price momentum, Keiraville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison