Skip to main content

Edmonton vs Wilsonton

Property investment comparison - Edmonton, QLD 4869 vs Wilsonton, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edmonton wins 2, Wilsonton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEdmontonWilsonton
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$375K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.89%
Gross rental yield (units)6.30%3.90%
1-year house growth+16.9%+22.4%
3-year house growth+55.9%+69.0%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.3%
Population11,4095,891

Edmonton vs Wilsonton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Edmonton and $750K in Wilsonton.

For units, Edmonton sits at a median of $375K against $600K in Wilsonton, which makes Edmonton the more affordable unit market and Wilsonton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.9% in Edmonton and +22.4% in Wilsonton, so recent momentum favours Wilsonton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Edmonton houses are +55.9% and Wilsonton houses +69.0%, so Wilsonton has compounded faster than Edmonton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Wilsonton and 0.9% in Edmonton, so landlords in Wilsonton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edmonton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,409 against 5,891, larger than Wilsonton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wilsonton for recent price momentum, Wilsonton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison