Eglinton vs Minore
Property investment comparison - Eglinton, NSW 2795 vs Minore, NSW 2830
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eglinton wins 1, Minore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Eglinton | Minore |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750K | $750K |
| Median unit price | $445K | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 3.53% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.33% | 5.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +19.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Population | 3,012 | 194 |
Eglinton vs Minore: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Eglinton and $750K in Minore.
For units, Eglinton sits at a median of $445K against $350K in Minore, which makes Minore the more affordable unit market and Eglinton the pricier one.
On cash flow, Eglinton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.53% in Minore, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Minore and 2.1% in Eglinton, so landlords in Minore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Eglinton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,012 against 194, roughly 16 times the size of Minore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Eglinton for rental income, Minore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison