Skip to main content

Eglinton vs Tarro

Property investment comparison - Eglinton, NSW 2795 vs Tarro, NSW 2322

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eglinton wins 2, Tarro wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEglintonTarro
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$445K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)5.33%5.05%
1-year house growth+8.8%+11.1%
3-year house growth+19.1%+25.5%
Vacancy rate2.1%2.8%
Population3,0121,703

Eglinton vs Tarro: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Eglinton and $750K in Tarro.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.20% in Eglinton and 4.20% in Tarro, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.8% in Eglinton and +11.1% in Tarro, so recent momentum favours Tarro, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Eglinton houses are +19.1% and Tarro houses +25.5%, so Tarro has compounded faster than Eglinton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Eglinton and 2.8% in Tarro, so landlords in Eglinton face less competition for tenants.

Eglinton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,012 against 1,703, larger than Tarro; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tarro for recent price momentum, Eglinton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison