Eleebana vs Towradgi
Property investment comparison - Eleebana, NSW 2282 vs Towradgi, NSW 2518
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eleebana wins 2, Towradgi wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Eleebana | Towradgi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $850K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.20% | 3.50% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | +7.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +24.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Population | 6,460 | 3,241 |
Eleebana vs Towradgi: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Eleebana and $1.4M in Towradgi.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Eleebana and +7.5% in Towradgi (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Eleebana, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Towradgi and 1.2% in Eleebana, so landlords in Towradgi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Eleebana is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,460 against 3,241, larger than Towradgi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Eleebana for recent price momentum, Towradgi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison